The reviews are automatic translation.
On 2017-01-17 18:00:16
Not suitable for the operation of the easy to wear, but a long period of time of the car for the price
Because What a for Mabaiku there is minus be satisfied
Commuting + outdoor light work
On 2016-01-18 10:37:33
As there is also the other do other post, now it contains a crack to penetrate the water to quickly and fairly.
The comfort is not so bad, but it seems unfortunate can be as footwear.
Machining General, welding, etc.
On 2015-03-31 13:29:19
From beginning to wear, cracking occurred in about 3 days.
Since I have worn, but we now also be used, from the design and comfort, this crack is very regrettable.
If you can somehow ask for improvement, ...... may also purchase again
Home of farm work
On 2015-02-02 21:51:29
The first time I purchased this safety shoes. It will face great difficulty in foil. I am troubled because of the high instep. Comfort lightly wear once you wear is very good. So easy to wear is the law of safety shoes with a chuck to the side, I do not buy again.
Building site work
On 2014-12-02 13:20:56
It is very easy to wear and comfortable safety shoes.
It is easy to use and lighter than I thought.
A substitute for the rider boots.
On 2014-08-25 19:00:38
In addition to rain, but it was amount to feeling or such a thing, the feet in rain water is soaked was riding a motorcycle at the time of rainy weather is, drenched state.
It can not be used when the outing.
Use at work site
On 2014-04-18 23:23:13
Buy is recently but, entering on the first day of wearing was in the water.
Then, after wearing a few times, it has expired the center near the inside of the right foot.
Degree is thinned's unclear to soft but that was pressed to do something a little (hard ones)? It expires in the
I think that whether as a safety shoes.
Water is entering versa.
Is the most durability was not in safety shoes that I bought so far.
I think that there is no problem if indoor use, but it is better to quit than to use in the field.
Size is also a good person who bought a 0.5cm smaller. It is just the 26cm if 25.5cm. (Ankle thick people be hard to wear)
Twice and do not buy it for reference
On 2014-04-18 13:14:07
Width is a little tight.
Substitution of motorcycle boots
On 2014-02-14 21:54:21
It was purchased for the purpose of the bike ride.
Design and comfort is not bad.
The material looks cheap, but I think that it can be enough to compromise in view of the price.
Size is a little bigger, but we do not have any problem because the wear thick socks.
Because it is a synthetic leather appears to waterproof it is also good.
I think that it may raise thickened a little more of the material fabric protection strength.
In addition, I think the perfect or if a little more stretch bamboo.
To bike commuting heavy goods machinery maintenance
On 2013-02-14 01:55:16
Strongly to the wind and rain is in the price, I think that it is good shoes because it is difficult stuffiness.
But fatal for is the size and exact representation of difference. Since the safety shoes of 25.0cm from the same manufacturer have liked, but I bought this product (25.5cm), in too big unbelievably 25.5cm, there is also to be a likely take off and walking also put the insole .
Where the legs were asked to wear two people colleague of 26.5 to 27, it had said that just good both of them.
It is the place you want to re-buy the 24.5cm, but when I wear emergency small was → No Return
Also hesitate because troubled because.
Honest, was most disappointed in the shopping at Monotarou's until now.
I'd like a response in some form.