The reviews are automatic translation.
On 2017-01-25 16:17:56
It is light, distortion is also less tired difficulty likely, durability is still unknown.
Wear when entering in the factory at work.
On 2017-01-18 22:50:07
I do not feel tired even though nearly lightly. Field of view is also widely in the business
It does not have to be a hindrance.
Protective goggles at the time of work
On 2016-06-24 21:12:11
Less likely to be damaged, durable. Less distortion
Lathing, when grinder work
On 2016-05-28 00:59:40
Because not fog even wore a mask, it is wore all day. Or because the light, it was shifted good to be without. I think faceted no longer infiltration decreased the gap when the upper eaves there until a little more forehead side.
Operation of the machine tool
On 2016-04-03 13:58:41
Design is also good, there is no sense of discomfort because there is no distortion even if worn.
On 2014-08-24 09:14:14
I chose by design priority. It is a bit of my ear. It is safe for practical use.
Outdoor work such as mowing
On 2013-10-17 08:44:31
I kept using similar cheap commodities, but it was cloudy, easy to scratch, crackle, frequent replacement was necessary. I expected it because it is a first-class manufacturer, but unfortunately I adjusted the pads on my face but my nose got pain and it did not fit.
On 2013-10-08 16:36:28
Although the worker has not used it yet, I can not do impressions etc. There was a comment that the design seemed easy to use.
Removal of sealing materials
On 2012-11-01 22:47:27
I chose it by appearance. It is popular among young workers. I am comfortable to wear, but I think that visibility is good and it does not hurt everywhere and it is no problem. When wearing a mask, it will cloudy again. Although it is a scratch, I think that there is no problem level unless treated as miscellaneous. Just to think about the price is obvious. It is too expensive for workers to handle miscellaneous .... I think that I will choose this protective eyeglass next time.