The reviews are automatic translation.
On 2016-10-14 08:42:01
We are using a 12 micron and thin type, but is used without any problem even in comparison with the 15 micron which has been previously used.
On 2016-09-29 20:12:20
Normally good. When you buy some cheap but together than mass retailers want you to lower the more price.
Used in packaging at the time of the pallet shipping
On 2016-08-16 16:33:00
Previously it had been using a 15μ there is no problem even 12μ.
Storage is likely to be the paper tube winding a little more Hosokere.
You are using the packing of luggage on the pallet
On 2016-07-09 16:40:15
But it had been purchased always 15 microns will see Ganbatte at <use disposable packing> 12 microns so inexpensive in terms of you think that it is all right price in this 12 micron
When the goods transport, for load collapse prevention
On 2016-07-02 17:46:10
As long as you know, it is the lowest. If possible, it is still thin but okay.
On 2016-06-25 12:32:26
No problem at all without
Load collapse prevention at the time of delivery
On 2016-06-10 15:17:48
June stock of products than ever before, resulting in cut very thin immediately.
When the product packaging
On 2016-06-08 16:48:00
Until now we've been using the stretch film of 15-18 microns, it was purchased a 12 micron prices There is also a test to Mr. Monotarou.
In the time it buys another company, which had expired well is not the place is now possible, such as torn in this commodity.
You safe to use even on a regular purchase.
At the time parts delivery
On 2016-05-20 14:29:47
I was using the thing of 15 microns to earlier.
I'm using for many years but is no particular problem.
Word of the I tried this time 12 microns does not change from the usual thing of the user.
Price also has survived cheap.
Stabilizing cargo during transportation work
On 2016-04-23 10:55:16
Because the film is thin, in some cases, in the middle that are wrapped around the luggage, and torn.
But, because the price is cheap, we use here.