The reviews are automatic translation.
On 2017-05-22 18:10:30
Until now, I used a hand-type thing, the characters became dirty, so it was new, it was an inspirational thing, it was good to purchase
On 2016-10-03 17:08:22
Not take place in the small size to the whole, but Deyusupurei is also easy to see until there was good
Drawback of the only character by character can not be out character
Use of receipt
On 2015-09-02 14:42:11
Until now, it makes it easy to save time since it receipt created at the touch of a button because it was handwritten.
Bookkeeping to check
On 2015-05-01 16:26:52
Improvements, etc., do not have any. Size and usability, we have in particular satisfaction.
On 2012-10-30 13:08:10
Since the questionnaire postcard was attached at the time of purchase, I purchased it because it was stated that it can print also on the receipt which was also answered there, but the \ mark was originally printed on our receipt I was not able to use the check mark writer \ mark and dubbing. I wish I could operate the check mark by putting a \ mark or removing (checking) (receipt) on the check writer, but it was disappointing. I write it in the questionnaire postcard to see if there is any method or mail it.
For issuing checks and receipts ...
On 2012-07-05 19:28:02
It is simple and very easy to use.
Create bills, checks
On 2012-05-31 13:18:20
It should be easy to use
Use of printing on checks and receipts
On 2012-05-18 14:25:21
Easy to match letters The width of the receipt is easy to match
On 2012-02-09 12:17:21
It is easy to use and satisfied.
Check / bill
On 2012-02-07 17:37:24
As MAX's checkwriter, which I used before, broke down, it is a replacement. It is surprising that the performance is the same and the size of the main body is about half and small. I had a hard time with the initial positioning etc, but after that I decided it was a user friendly machine.