The reviews are automatic translation.
When finishing the product
On 2017-12-08 12:38:57
I think that it is better because the price is cheaper than the one I bought until now.
Welding, painting work
On 2017-12-03 13:19:58
I used it for welding, undercoating at the time of painting, etc. I think it's good.
Making foundation for welding work etc.
On 2017-06-12 15:20:22
Third-party products (3M) Very good with no inferior usability. I am happy that prices are cheap only for consumables.
On 2017-05-24 17:58:51
I bought it because it is cheaper than a certain manufacturer.
Polishing of metal
On 2017-01-19 09:36:22
Because it is a consumable part, it is saved that the price is cheap.
Polishing of fine protrusions during race vehicle production
On 2016-08-26 16:45:41
Easy to use than the manufacturer you used before
On 2016-07-22 10:29:53
I have used only one but as it is not too bad I bought it because I can buy it cheaper than the used parts store. I think that it can be convinced when considering cost effectiveness. It would be nice if there are no variations in the way you use it in the future ...
On 2015-08-27 09:52:57
The price is cheap, but the life expectancy is too short compared to that of a famous manufacturer, so the total profit was 0. There were many fatal problems of being able to cut at the joint immediately after use.
Cutting of metal
On 2015-08-27 00:48:04
Although it becomes a comparison with 3M, the cutting power at the time of a new article is good. Just holding is a step now. Though the 3M thing can be used just before the polished part is peeled off, it does not seem to be durable to that extent. The belt will run out even in a state that it can be used until seam finish is bad. Because the seams of the seams are so big that they caught there and stop the rotation of the belt (often idle)
Polishing of fine parts of parts
On 2015-06-10 07:01:55
I think it's good.