The reviews are automatic translation.
On 2017-01-25 20:29:16
Do not check carefully (2 hole binder) and ordered it so it is hard to use, so I devised the file and put it in another clear paper and I make a finder.
On 2016-07-29 18:45:19
There is no problem in initial use. It is saved for a few purchase, short delivery time.
On 2016-06-13 18:11:50
It is very cheap as a pipe file.
On 2016-02-17 14:54:34
The fastening metal is hard to use. The plastic part is caught bad.
I use it to keep a ledger at work.
On 2015-11-16 08:33:33
The price is reasonable and I am saved. When binding the file, I feel that I'm using it several times when the metal fittings are hard to stay or when it is easy to get out of the product depending on the product.
Organizing documents that have been accumulated since long ago
On 2015-03-27 08:33:26
It is easy to use because it is not inferior to the manufacturer. I want two sheets of paper on the back cover instead of just one.
On 2014-09-22 21:32:41
Very easy to use
On 2014-09-01 10:16:00
Compared with major stationery manufacturers, when the structure of the two-hole file closing part is caught and the documents are packed too much, the clasp may open naturally. However, at a price less than half of the majority, COSPA is overwhelmingly good. This is enough for me.
On 2014-06-12 07:33:18
After three to four times opening and closing it became useless. After all I repurchased to another manufacturer. Typical of cheap and bad.
Management of purchasing slips
On 2014-05-13 14:36:45
Ideal for storing documents with a lot of volume.
On 2013-11-20 01:30:34
The spine cover is blue in color and can not be classified. Paper quality is not bad, but metal fittings with thin plating due to insufficient deburring are obviously cheap and difficult to insert and remove. ASKUL is much better if it is PB goods.
Long-term storage of various application forms, survey materials, accounting documents
On 2013-09-24 13:43:26
I think that quality is equivalent even compared with K and A which used conventionally. Considering the price is buying. We bought 30 books in total this time, we purchased a total of 30 volumes, but I am happy that I can efficiently add or change materials from the back side. Damage in the hole of the document is also natural, but it is also satisfactory.
On 2013-03-21 13:46:35
I regularly purchased pipe type files, but I always used Kokuyo or King gym. Because the price is cheap, I tried purchasing it this time. I feel that the cover is harder than those of other companies, or because I am not used to it, it is difficult to stop the document. If I am accustomed and have no problem, I will continue to purchase it.
On 2012-10-02 17:48:40
Although the lock mechanism feels slightly hard, I think that it is a problem of familiarity.
Storage of accumulated documents
On 2012-03-06 15:23:08
I bought several copies, but one of them did not work with metal hardware. I have not said anything since I have been three months since purchasing. . .
It's a document file
On 2012-02-19 11:16:31
Quality does not feel a problem So price is half price of market price With this it is a monotail
On 2011-06-18 19:19:49
With this cheap quality is almost unchanged.
On 2011-05-27 22:05:21
Although it is a pretty good product, the price difference with other companies is not much.
Organize bills and estimates.
On 2011-04-21 14:42:14
There is no substitute for other manufacturer products. There is no abnormality even when using it everyday.
Organizing samples and organizing daily work reports
On 2010-12-10 13:51:28
Because the price is cheap, I have not expected much, but the actual thing is solid and satisfactory. As a single request, I want the headline part to be pocketed.